In the field of Quality Management Systems (QMS), there are two types of audits commonly conducted: 1) internal audits and 2.) Party audits, which are typically carried out by a certifying authority. However, there is one obvious missing in both cases: the absence of high management from the auditing process.
The causes might range from audit teams’ unwillingness to interact with higher-ups to worries of retaliation for asking tough questions. But when senior management gives the go-ahead for inclusion, what essential questions should you ask to assess their commitment?
Below are 5 essential questions that offer valuable insights into top management’s commitment to a successful and effective Quality Management System.
Aligning all organizational functions requires a fundamental understanding of the company’s goal. Is there a record of the vision? If so, how are all levels of the organization, including front-line staff, informed about this vision? A clear, well-articulated vision demonstrates management’s commitment to the company’s future.
KPIs provide quantifiable proof of a business’s advancement towards its goals. It is important to find out how these KPIs are distributed throughout the organizational structure. All staff members, irrespective of their position, ought to understand their part in accomplishing these KPIs. This illustrates how well management integrates organizational goals at every level.
A well-funded QMS is frequently a trustworthy gauge of the dedication of upper management. Concern over the funding and other resources allotted to upkeep and enhancement of the Quality Management System. A lack of resources might indicate that management doesn’t think highly of the Quality Policy.
In the Quality Management System, management ought to be more than just observers; they ought to be actively involved. Their participation in the QMS and their devotion to their group serve as a reflection of the organization’s general dedication to quality standards.
Evaluations of management should be more than just checking boxes. Find out who attends these evaluations, how often they happen, and what important decisions were taken at the most recent meeting. Examine the methods used for recording and disseminating the minutes of these evaluations. These specifics make it clear if the meetings are held only to satisfy compliance requirements or for actual operational purposes.
Conclusion
Ignoring high management’s participation in audits is a major error that must be addressed. These five questions to evaluate top management are not only useful for auditing; they also provide a framework for evaluating the depth of management’s commitment to quality and overall organizational excellence. Once you start asking the correct questions, you’ll see that the answers may lead to changes that spread across the organization.